Saw this over at Kurtz’s site and thought it was pretty interesting. I won’t quote it all here, but what is your take on this whole thing? I think i get where Scott is coming from on his take, but I guess one of the ways I look at it is this: PA is getting some serious recognition, and one editors opinion on things surely does not dirty up the water too much. In fact, one could say that even negative press is good press…it means you are out there, getting noticed, and your getting larger, ever larger. Anyway, worth a read if you have a few minutes.