Comments on: Comic: “Two sides to every argument”

By: DoggySpew

DoggySpew — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 19:07:17 +0000

I never was a purist. As time goes by, I realise that the old is not allways good. Nostalgia hits, when the good is remembered and the bad is forgotten, but then actually going back is not an option.

For me, The Next Generation was when my Scifi fascination hit. Looking back, especially the first 2 seasons, TNG looked very crappy, but not in my memory. Looking at the original Series, I can’t help it that I really do not like the acting. But it was acting that on par of the same time. Acting has evolved. Even the Shia Labeaufs of today act better then most actors in the 60′s, in my opinion, or at least more appealing for this age.

So Star Trek reinvented like this, I like.

By: Kyle Voltti

Kyle Voltti — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:44:46 +0000

I’m in the “I’m a Star Trek fan and I think this movie will be cool” camp

By: Moobie

Moobie — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:19:09 +0000

That is a fantastic characature of Gene Roddenberry!

By: Gene

Gene — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:28:22 +0000

I guess no one likes different perspectives on a certain topic. That sentence can also be summed up as being called “The Fanboy’s Dilemma.”

By: Darrell

Darrell — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:48:22 +0000

Prion: I agree with you completely.
.
It’s not about “another actor playing Kirk”. It’s about a little kid playing someone defined as being 35 at the beginning.
.
The idea of just a new ship & not a prequel would have been better. It’s time to do something original… or at least somewhat so.